The Way Forward to Islamic Banking in India

By Riyazi Farook Islamic Finance News, 5th January 2007.

Islamic banking is the fastest growing concept the world over but has not caught on in India. There are currently a handful of foreign banks operating in the country which are offering Islamic banking products. These include Lloyds TSB, Citibank, Grindlays, Standard Chartered, HSBC and ABN AMRO, which are already operating interest free banking in several west Asian countries, Europe and the US. There are a few home-grown banks like ICICI and Kotak Mahindra which offer Islamic banking products as Indian banks become increasingly aware of the Islamic banking concept and confi dent of the huge potential market in India.

The resilience of the Islamic banking industry already seen in many parts of the world could progress further with the distinctive advantages which India can offer. A population of over 1.3 billion is certainly a massive market to tap. India has the capability to offer huge manpower and natural resources. Opportunities which India can offer are in the areas of technical and managerial talent, with the added benefi t of international experience, given the underlying strength of its economy in which the country has emerged as one of the fastest growing economies in the world.

At this juncture, Islamic banking in India is limited to the co-operative sector scattered in various states all over the country. Islamic banks in operation number less than 15, with deposits of about US$150 million. In reality, they are just non-banking fi nance companies (NBFCs) which function on the basis of profi t and loss. These so-called Islamic banks cater to the needs of their locality except for a few that operate across districts or states. As their sources of funds are limited and their existence is small scaled, they miss out on any economies of scale.

Islamic banks in India provide housing loans on the basis of coownership, venture fi nance on Mudarabah or profi t-sharing and Musharakah or equity participation and consumers’ loans. Some banks fi nance transport also on the Murabahah or mark up basis through hire purchase.

As for investments, the Islamic banks put their funds in government securities, small savings schemes or mutual funds and to a smaller extent, investment in shares of companies or the stock market. Conventional banks are showing preference to undertake this form of interest-free banking. However, the absence of a legal Islamic banking framework is making it diffi cult for scheduled commercial banks to manage this form of banking or even adopt the Islamic banking system in a small way. Islamic banks in India are not under the control of its banking regulations but are licensed under the Non Banking Finance Companies Reserve Bank Directives 1997 RBI (Amendment) Act 1997, operating on profi t and loss (Mudarabah) under Islamic principles. RBI has also introduced a compulsory registration system.

Even if banks are allowed to set up windows that offer Islamic banking services, they need to maintain cash reserves and a Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) which involves interest. ettlement and clearing facilities are not available from these banks, therefore their inability to issue cheques.

There is an urgent underlying need to regulate the fi nancial institutions in India given such an immense market among Muslims. A regulated Islamic banking industry would offer the masses an avenue to channel their money into the formal banking system, be it conventional or Islamic.

Muslims in India have undoubtedly regarded religion as the biggest hurdle for them to deposit their money in the bank or to obtain funding for developing their businesses or ventures. A huge proportion of this population even avoids serving in fi nancial institutions. The nonparticipation of Muslims in India’s formal banking institutions has not only weighed down their economic prospects but also prevented a huge sum of money belonging to the Muslim community to participate in the national development. Islamic banking can certainly revolutionize the micro-fi nance sector in the country and become an advantage for the debt-ridden farmers in areas like Maharashtra.

The Indian fi nance ministry has advised the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to draw a roadmap for Islamic banking in the country. This is a step in the right direction to tap both the local market as well as major fi nancial players from the middle-east.

Subsequent to this advice, RBI has taken the initiative to explore the feasibility of Islamic banking. A committee comprising senior bankers from the State Bank of India and other government and foreign banks and headed by Anand Sinha, chief general manager in charge of banking operations and development have tabled a feasibility study along with their recommendations. The fi ndings have yet to be made public.

Other initiatives towards Islamic banking in the country have been sporadic in the form of press briefi ngs, literature circulation and seminars. A recent move to get the government’s involvement in Islamic banking was the presentation to the fi nance ministry and RBI by Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH), on the need to amend the RBI Act and launch Islamic banking in India. (JIH is one of the leading Muslim organizations based in Delhi).

A Bahrain-based private equity fund, with an amount of US$1 billion has expressed an interest to start an India-specifi c fund. Also fi rms like Abu Dhabi Investment, Qatar Investment Authority and Islamic Bank Finance House are looking at investing in India. This will all lead to the speeding up of the development process for the country as a whole.

Regulatory issues need to be put in place before Islamic banking can be introduced in India and its benefi ts can be enjoyed to the fullest.
Islamic Banking and Finance in Sri Lanka: A Paradigm of Success

By Riyazi Farook


Sri Lanka’s modern financial sector has undergone significant reforms since the early 1990s, notably to reduce the government’s role as a direct financial provider. A wide range of institutions offer financial services, including public and private banks, development finance institutions, merchant banks, investment banks, specialized financial institutions, microfinance institutions, leasing companies and insurance companies.

There is also a burgeoning stock exchange. The government is taking steps to strengthen the institutional and regulatory framework for financial services. A remarkable recent evolution is the reform and reorganization of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL).

The monetary unit in Sri Lanka is the rupee (LKR), which consists of 100 cents (US$1 approx LKR 110). In addition to being the island’s monetary authority and the sole bank of issue, CBSL acts as financial adviser to the government.

Currently, more than 15 foreign banks have set up branches in the island nation. What is more significant is that some of these branches have been established for more than 100 years. Sri Lanka also has more than 10 local banks, including two that are state-owned (Bank of Ceylon and People’s Bank).

Sri Lanka is one of the few non-Islamic countries to have legislation for the Islamic banking sector. Following amendments to the Banking Act No 30 of 1988 in March 2005, there is now adequate flexibility for conventional banks to establish Islamic banking windows and launch Islamic financial products. However, efforts in strategic marketing communication to promote and raise awareness of these products are still in the infancy stage.

CBSL has already authorized Islamic banking to be carried out in licensed commercial banks as a regulated and legal activity. However, CBSL is studying the Islamic banking concepts and once the requirements are legislated in the Banking Act, Sri Lanka would have increasing opportunity to establish a full-fledged bank. Meanwhile, senior Muslim ministers are also backing an initiative to allow full-fledged Islamic banks to operate in the country.

Sri Lankan Muslims have long awaited the entry of a full-fledged Islamic financial institution that can provide them the opportunity to invest or deposit their money in a Shariah compliant manner. Islamic microfinance institutions in the rural areas are also keen to capitalize on this need, but most are offering limited service in small communities with a high density of Muslims.

The country has the potential to become an Islamic banking hub for the South Asian region. Nevertheless, only if CBSL expresses its interest and development initiatives does Sri Lanka stand a chance of competing and establishing itself in the market. Therefore, government organizations, monetary authorities and the private sector must work with Islamic banking institutions to achieve this objective.

In light of this, it is high time that Sri Lanka came up with a strategic framework on the Islamic financial sector in order to address the needs of all segments of the community. There are specialized local and overseas institutions and professionals, some of whom are experts in Islamic banking; others may have good managerial skills to contribute to the promotion of Islamic banking and its concepts. Therefore, it is paramount to include such specialists in a discussion on building a conceptual framework for Islamic banking and finance in Sri Lanka.

Players in Islamic finance

The market value of the Islamic banking sector in Sri Lanka is estimated at LKR 70 billion to LKR 100 billion (US$634 million to US$907 million). Islamic financial services providers currently active there include Amana Investments Limited, Ceylinco Islamic Investment Corporation (CIIC), Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB), National Asset Management Limited (NAMAL), First Global Investments Group and ABC Investments.

Amana Investments, established in 1997, leads the country’s Islamic financial services market. Its subsidiary Amana Takaful Ltd (ATL) began operations in June 1999 and is acknowledged as the market leader for Takaful services (commonly perceived as the Islamic alternative to conventional insurance). ATL was listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange in late 2006.

CIIC made its entry in 2003 and is fully backed by Ceylinco Insurance, one of the leading conventional insurance providers in Sri Lanka. CIIC offers both selected Shariah compliant and Takaful products.

New kid on the block MCB — owned by MCB Pakistan — commenced operations early this year. It offers both Islamic and conventional financial products.

NAMAL is the first fund management company in Sri Lanka licensed to manage unit trusts. Together with Amana Capital (a subsidiary of Amana Investments), it launched the NAMAL Amana Equity Fund early this month. The objective of the equity fund is to achieve significant growth over the medium to long term by primarily investing in equity securities that are Shariah compliant.

First Global Group is a public limited finance investment company that deals with Shariah compliant investments and financing products and services. Domestically, it is the first institution to promote training and career development programs related to Islamic banking and finance.

Finally, there’s ABC Investments, a relatively new Islamic investment group that claims to have strong funding backing from different countries. It has a memorandum of understanding with the Central Bank of Sudan in which the latter’s experts will provide assistance on training and development to ABC — especially in its Takaful segment — and will be working closely with leading Islamic financial countries for the funding in Takaful as they plan to start off with general insurance.

Barriers in Takaful industry

The Takaful concept is steadily gaining acceptance in Sri Lanka, where there are now 13 licensed insurance companies. Takaful was introduced in 2002 with the entry of ATL, which recently created history in Sri Lanka and the Islamic financial services industry worldwide when it was ranked 203rd in the world’s first comprehensive “Top 500 Islamic Financial Institutions” published by The Banker, the global finance magazine of the Financial Times Group, in its November issue. ATL accounted for US$5.55 million worth of Shariah compliant assets.

A second Takaful operator, Ceylinco Takaful Limited, made its debut in mid-2006. Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation Limited — the republic’s largest and strongest composite insurance provider with LKR 50 billion worth of assets under management — has also announced its intended foray into Takaful. Two of the country’s largest insurance operators (Ceylinco Life and Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation) also plan to offer Takaful products.

The Sri Lankan market, including that for Takaful, faces several challenges, however. One is the current legal environment, which is deemed unfavorable to Takaful operations. Other hurdles are reluctance on the part of regulators to introduce the necessary changes in law to encourage the development of Takaful, a lack of investment opportunities that are Shariah compliant and acceptable to the insurance regulators, a high capital requirement, severe competition, consumer resistance to a new form of insurance based on religious principles and the fact that Muslims represent only about 9% of Sri Lanka’s population.

Overcoming these barriers is more crucial for the Takaful industry in Sri Lanka. Its operators should make a concerted effort to convince insurance regulators to accept the salient features of Takaful and treat it as a new business model. They could also form strategic alliances to promote their products.

Human resource needs

Sri Lanka should aim to produce highly skilled practitioners and professionals as well as specialists and researchers to develop human capital needs for its Islamic banking and financial services industry, both at local and international level. Shariah scholars are scarce but they are highly critical to the success of the republic’s Islamic banking industry and its growth.

International Center for Education in Islamic Finance recently established the faculty of Islamic banking and finance, the first in Sri Lanka. It is hoped that the faculty will fulfill the need to produce a pool of Islamic professionals for the fast-growing global Islamic banking and financial services industry.

'Global Islamic Financial Intelligence Summit-2007 ' -Riyazi Farook


Video quality: Poor
Venue:
Radisson Edwardian Mayfair Hotel, London

Date:WEDNESDAY 7th NOVEMBER 2007


Financial Times Global Events produce timely and focused UK and international banking & pensions events of the highest standard. With a strong brand and reputation, our high calibre speakers and rich agendas attract only the most senior delegates. In 2007, Financial Times Global Events will deliver over 80 conferences, briefings, roundtables and awards dinners in London, continental Europe, the Middle East, Asia and North America, attracting the highest quality delegates from the banking and financial services sector. Financial Times Global Events have a combined 85 years experience in events production. We strive to make every event a success.


Islamic Finance: Emerging Challenges of Supervision
Dr. Shamshad Akhtar-Governor, State Bank of Pakistan
I. Background

Diversification and structural transformation in financial sector has beenaccompanied by increasing integration among different segments of the financial sector.The traditional boundaries between banks and non-bank financial institutions are erodingand we are witnessing the growth of universal banking and/or mergers among differentsegments of sectors.
This trend has its benefits but has associated risks as well. Supervisors face a dualchallenge. On one hand, supervisors are promoting financial diversification andconsolidation to achieve market development and innovation. On the other hand,supervisors have to position themselves to recognize the new dimensions and types of risksand encourage appropriate risk mitigation. These considerations have triggered world widedebate on how to effectively supervise different segments of financial sector inconglomerate and universal structure.

So far these debates had been concentrated around conventional banking but now itis widely gripping the world of Islamic Finance (IF). Stronger inter-dependencies amongdifferent segments of IF are emerging largely because Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs), inprinciple, have features and inherent characteristics and more compulsion, thanconventional banking, to conform to universal banking or to evolve inter-linkages amongdifferent market segments.

II. Factors Driving Cross-sector Linkages and Interdependencies

First and foremost, IFIs’ depositors/borrowers desire to conduct financialtransactions that are Shariah compliant. It can be assumed that a person preferring to bankwith an Islamic bank will also seek to use other faith-based financial services such asTakaful and Islamic mutual funds. This faith-driven feature in itself forces and incentivizesIFIs to offer, along side bank-based services (i.e. deposit and loans), a wide range offinancial services. As a result, Islamic banks end up undertaking non-core banking activitiessuch as fund management, capital market operations, securitization, leasing, and housingfinance. This has enhanced the degree of integration between various segments of IF. Forexample: Islamic banks are likely to be strongly integrated with the Shariah capital marketssince on credit portfolio side, Islamic banks do not have the same investment avenues asthose available to their conventional counterparts. The outcome is that Islamic banks eitherend up taking large exposure in the capital markets directly or acquire subsidiaries whichprimarily engage in such businesses.

Second differentiating aspect is the nature of contractual arrangements that drivedeposits mobilized by conventional banks as compared to Islamic banks. Conventional bankdeposits are interest based contracts with guaranteed interest return whereas Islamic banksraise deposit on a profit and loss sharing basis in either a Mudaraba or Musharaka structure.Mudaraba/Musharaka contracts transform the Islamic banks’ deposits into essentially a fundmanagement product (although currently most regulators recognize these as equivalent toconventional deposit contracts) and this impacts the corresponding asset portfolio. There isa need therefore that Islamic banks acquire assets on a PLS basis as well and eventuallymove beyond fixed return products, like Murabaha and Ijara. This pushes an Islamic banktowards universal banking since in order to manage the portfolio profitability; it needs toinvest across sectors in businesses based on Shariah principles, like equity and Sukuks inthe capital market and trade contracts like commodity Murabaha, Musharaka, Ijara andTakaful.

Thirdly, further development of Islamic banking itself depends on concurrentdevelopment of Islamic capital market. For instance, development of Islamic debt market iskey to the provision of adequate liquidity support while providing additional investmentavenues. Likewise, Takaful development is critical to provide insurance coverage to Islamicbanking products, like auto and consumer financing, while strengthening secondary capitaland Islamic bond markets by being a major buyer of Islamic instruments. It is the confluenceof these factors that have induced regulators to encourage and IFs to promote rapid anddeeper financial inter-linkages and integration.

III. Supervisory Challenges posed by Cross-sector Developments

It is some of these above considerations that have augmented strategic alliancesand linkages of various types among IFIs, both within country and cross borders. As such,IFIs are evolving either as part of a global financial concern or as a domestic bank acquiringor establishing subsidiaries and/or the two arms, i.e. Islamic and conventional banks coexist.Moreover, as the conventional parts of financial institutions move towards cross-sectorintegration, their Islamic counterparts (either as specialized window or as independententities) will also follow eventually.
While it has by now been well established that there are significant benefits ofenhanced integration and inter-linkages or conglomeration in IF, such as the economies ofscale, operational synergies and effective use of scarce human resource, there are definitelycertain risks. In this area, I would like to offer few basic observations.Firstly, it is inevitable that enhanced exposure of Islamic banks into capital marketsexposes them to the volatility in associated businesses. Likewise, conglomeration, whetherthrough universal banking or through parent subsidiary model,2 exposes them to a variety of issues such as contagion risk, regulatory arbitrage, high group exposures, conflict of interestetc. These risks apply equally to both Islamic and conventional modes of finance. However,Islamic banks have thus far not erected firewalls, like conventional banks, to separatelegally, financially and managerially their investment and commercial banking activities.Obviously these risks pose a challenge to the supervisors and necessitate that appropriatechanges be made in the supervisory regime.

Secondly, Shariah compliance issues necessitate taking a more aligned view acrossIF businesses as user of Islamic products may be oblivious of ideological differences as wellas varying perceptions and interpretation of the Shariah advisors or boards and/or byregulators. Since institutions being supervised by one regulatory authority may be offeringproducts of institutions being supervised by a different regulatory body, this could introducecomplications and the challenge of ensuring uniform Shariah compliance across financialinstitutions and products.

Thirdly, traditionally different segments have been regulated by their specializedsupervisory authorities. These authorities have adopted risk management principles andsupervisory stances which are strictly in line with the risk profile of supervised sectors inisolation. With sector integration, supervisors have to coordinate closely in policy formulationand regulation as well as on-site supervision. They have to coordinate creation of necessaryfirewalls, remove moral hazards and govern the degree of cross segment exposure. Thismay even call for institutional restructuring through merging various supervisory bodies intoa single entity or for closer coordination between supervisors through creation of a thirdcoordinating body.

IV. Sector Inter-linkages of Pakistan’s Islamic Finance System

In Pakistan, besides offering trade loans, like Murabaha, Islamic banks are offeringequity and quasi equity products, such as Musharaka and diminishing Musharaka, andinvestment banking activities such as loan syndication, structured finance, etc. The six fullfledged Islamic banks with a network of 108 branches and another 58 stand alone Islamicbranches of 13 conventional banks have registered phenomenal growth and as of April2007, the Islamic banking sector constituted 3.3% of total banking assets.3 In view of theequity based nature of Islamic banking and lack of Shariah compliant financial instruments,central bank has allowed Islamic banks a relatively higher exposure (35% direct and 10%future of their equity) in capital markets compared to conventional banks (20% direct and10% future). In addition, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has relaxed statutory reserverequirement (SLR) for Islamic banks at 8% versus industry norm of 18%.Furthermore, Islamic banks are allowed to nurture parent-subsidiary/affiliate modelwhereby Islamic banks are by and large setting up asset management companies,brokerage firms and, now, Takaful businesses. Thus far the supervision of IFIs is bifurcated,with Islamic banks being regulated by SBP and non-bank IFIs, namely, Modarabas, Islamicmutual funds, Takaful companies and securities operations under the regulatory oversight ofSecurities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).

Sector specific supervisory approach is also characterized by varying regulatoryrequirements vis-à-vis operational matters, governance framework and Shariah complianceacross the range of IFIs. The differences extend to minimum capital requirements ranging from Rs6 billion for Islamic banks (by the year 2009), Rs500 million for family Takafuloperators (by the year 2011), Rs300 million for general Takaful operators (by the year 2011)and Rs30 million for Islamic fund managers to Rs2.5 million for Modaraba managementcompanies. The low capital base of financial institutions, engaged in the business of Takafulor fund management, poses a significant risk to the solvency of financial conglomerates thatcharacterize the Islamic financial markets. In terms of financial reporting, Takaful companiesare not required to circulate quarterly accounts among shareholders whereas all otherIslamic financial institutions are required to do so in terms of the legal and regulatoryframework.

The segregated supervisory approach has resulted in carving of legal frameworkspecific to each sector for both conventional banks and IFIs4 but eventually there is a needfor addressing the idiosyncratic nature of IF industry, products and market players.Moreover, with regard to IF, both the regulators are following different approaches towardsShariah compliance in the institutions regulated by them. SBP requires Islamic banks toappoint Shariah advisors according to a prescribed fit and proper criteria and a ShariahBoard has been constituted at the level of SBP to deal with issues relating to Shariahinterpretation and compliance among Islamic banks. SECP’s approach varies acrossdifferent segments of IF. A Religious Board, constituted by the government, is responsiblefor approving the prospectus of each Modaraba containing the types of business to beconducted, management, etc. While the Religious Board has a significant role, there is norequirement for Modarabas or their management companies to appoint Shariah advisers atindividual fund level. Islamic mutual funds and Takaful operators, on the other hand, arerequired to appoint Shariah Council/Boards but no explicit fit and proper criteria has beenlaid down by SECP in this regard. SECP is also authorized to appoint a Central ShariahBoard under the Takaful Rules, 2005, which has not been established as yet.The greatest challenge resulting from different Shariah compliance practicesfollowed by Islamic banks, Modarabas, Takaful companies, etc. is the reputational risk facedby IFIs and misperceptions in the minds of public about Shariah compliance. This issue,therefore, needs to be addressed through coordination amongst the supervisors.Another issue arises from overlapping supervisory jurisdiction. The BankingCompany Ordinance allows banks to act as Modaraba management companies forfloatation of Modarabas. In terms of Modaraba Companies Ordinance, Modarabas can beformed to conduct any type of business, which is permitted under Shariah, be it trading,manufacturing, airline, financing, leasing, services, etc. and these are regulated by SECP.Due to overlapping regulatory jurisdictions, banks are floating modarabas through separatesubsidiaries,5 resulting in higher administrative, set up and regulatory costs. For sometime(from 1991-1997), these Modarabas were under the regulatory control of SBP, but thepowers relating to licensing, winding up, etc. were retained by SECP; consequently theregulatory authority has been reverted to SECP. Again, this highlights the need for crosssector regulation of IFIs.

Eventually there is a need to develop mechanisms for oversight of financial sector inan integrated manner. Besides coordination and cooperation among regulators, there is a need for consolidated supervision framework for financial institutions, guidelines forconsolidated public financial statements and application of regulatory prudential limits ongroup wide basis and coordination to examine the intra group linkages with industrial andcommercial entities. While conventional and Islamic financial industry would have to adoptsimilar approaches to integrated supervision, it has to be recognized that the latter is arelatively nascent industry and hence the targets should be modified to match the groundrealities.

V. Conclusion

IFSB’s ten year roadmap has highlighted the cross sector nature of IFIs and theresultant need for supervision to evolve accordingly. It is in recognition of these factors thatIFSB has sought to broaden its membership to securities and insurance supervisoryauthorities as Full Members of IFSB. IFSB’s efforts for developing Islamic regulations as wellas accounting, auditing and governance standards will facilitate adoption of unifiedprinciples for the development, operation and regulation of Islamic financial services.
Shari`ah Supervision of Islamic Mutual Funds
Yusuf Talal DeLorenzo
Islamic mutual funds presently represent one of the fastest growing sectors within the Islamic financial industry. As Shari`ah supervision is an integral part of the industry, its place in relation to Islamic mutual funds is certainly no less important. My intention in this paper is to discuss in a general way the variety of functions performed by Shari`ah supervision and their importance. In doing so, I will make observations about the industry and suggestions for a better future.

It is a matter of concern that a significant number of managed Islamic equity funds function without Shari`ah supervision of any sort. In fact, according to the data available on the ninety or so Islamic mutual funds, less than one half actually retain their own Shariah supervisory boards.1 This is an alarming circumstance which, for the reasons that will be discussed in this paper, needs to be remedied. Ideally, if management is slow to address the issue, then the remedy will come from the investors themselves. In fact, as Muslim investors grow in numbers and sophistication, they expect more from the professionals who manage their money. Then, in terms of performance, always the bottom line, and in terms of customer service, and in terms of Shari`ah compliance, Muslims have already begun to expect more and more from their funds. In terms of Shari`ah supervision, a great deal can be expected.

Particularly now, with the opening of the retail markets to middle class Muslim investors, Islamic mutual funds find themselves if not in direct competition, then at least subject to direct comparison, with the host of conventional mutual funds available to consumers. Today, funds offer all manner of services to investors, from virtual office space on their websites, to real time performance updates, to regular reports, to the ability to customize a portfolio by using a pin number and selecting new fund options online or over an automated phone systerm! In short, the mutual fund industry has progressed from its beginnings as almost a closed sort of country club operation that catered to a financial elite, to its present service-oriented state that is driven by competition. Our new generation of Islamic equity funds is a part of this market, and certainly subject to many of the trends that move it. It is for this reason that, by way of example, the Azzad / Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund offers its investors a host of online facilities, in addition to regular reports by management, independent auditors, and a Shari`ah Supervisory Board. Then, with standards of service, accountability and transparency rising to keep pace with the market, and with sophistication and expectations on the rise among Islamic investors, Islamic funds which fail to upgrade will certainly be bested by funds that succeed in doing so. Moreover, when retail Islamic funds begin to offer so much to their clients, investors in the other Islamic funds, institutions and high net worth individuals will not fail to take notice and, ultimately, either move their assets or insist that management take measures to give them more value for their money.
There are, however, instances of Islamic funds that have found other ways to see to the Shari`ah supervision of their businesses. For example, some funds have retained the services of a single Shari`ah supervisor. I find nothing wrong with such an arrangement, especially if the fund is set up to track an Islamic index like one of indexes from the Dow Jones Islamic Market Indexes family. Obviously, such an index fund will require less Shari`ah supervision for its portfolio than an actively managed portfolio because its investable universe will already have been screened by the Shari`ah Board of the index provider. Then, with the active support and cooperation of management, a single Shari`ah supervisor should suffice to ensure Shari`ah compliance and assume responsibility for the other aspects of Shari`ah supervision. Even so, the presence of a full board would undoubtedly be more assuring to investors, and quite possibly more effective as well.2

Another way that an Islamic fund may ensure Shari`ah supervision without retaining the services of a Shari`ah Supervisory Board is for it to appoint a Shari`ah scholar to the fund's Board of Trustees. Then the scholar may either chair a subcommittee or work alone to supervise the fund for Shari`ah compliance and oversee the other Shari`ahrelated matters. Thus, while the ideal situation will always be for a fund to retain the services of a full Shari`ah Supervisory Board, with three or more members, there are other ways of accomplishing the requisite Shari`ah supervision.

In this context, however, I would like to point out a serious misunderstanding that appears to have been repeated by a number of different Islamic mutual funds; though very likely with the best of intentions. This misunderstanding is based on the assumption that a fund licensed by an index provider with a Shari`ah Supervisory Board of its own will not require Shari`ah supervision of any sort; not in the form of a board, and not in the form of a single supervisor. Writing in a recent issue of New Horizon, a Muslim financial professional observed, The arrival of the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index is seen as a cure all for banking houses who wish to broaden their success in placing equity funds with wealthy Muslims. The requirement, however, that they must still contract a Shari`ah Board of their own to supervise their own behavior does not appear to be widely understood.
Obviously, an Islamic mutual fund will become a licensee to an index provider with its own Shari`ah Supervisory Board for the reason that the fund wants assurance for its investors that its choice of stocks will be Shari`ah compliant. However, there is a great deal more to Shari`ah supervision than the review of stock choices from a Shari`ah perspective. Then, even if the fund is licensed to an index like the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index, it will still require Shari`ah supervision and advice. In this paper, I shall attempt to explain why this is so by examining a number of different areas in which the participation of a Shari`ah scholar is essential.4 I will also speak of the need for the proactive involvement in fund affairs by its Shariah supervisor(s). Finally, I will make some recommendations on the future of Shari`ah supervision that I believe will add value to every Islamic mutual fund.
Consumer Advocacy
It is of primary importance to understand Shari`ah supervision as consumer advocacy. By taking every possible step to ensure that an Islamic mutual fund represents a halal investment for Muslims, the services performed by Shari`ah supervisors are directed toward the investor. Undoubtedly, as a result of these efforts, the fund and its management will also benefit. But the primary beneficiary is the Muslim investor who can rest assured that his/her money is being put to use in ways that accord with the teachings of Islam and its message for all of humankind. So, while the functions of a Shari`ah supervisor may be compared to those of an independent financial auditor, in the sense that regulatory compliance is ensured, there is a further and far more vital aspect to the role of a Shari`ah supervisor. By assuming responsibility for the Shari`ah compliance of a fund, including its components and its management, the Shari`ah supervisor places himself in a position of directly representing the religious interests of the investor. In discussing the different aspects of Shari`ah supervision, it will become clear that a Shari`ah supervisor functions in many different ways as a consumer advocate with both religious and fiduciary responsibilities. By performing these functions the Shari`ah Supervisor adds significant value to the fund(s) with which he works.
It has already been stated that there is far more to the Shari'ah supervision of an Islamic mutual fund than the screening and selection of equities. Let us now examine some of the different Shari`ah supervisory functions that are inseparable from the success of an Islamic mutual fund. One of the most important of these functions has to do with purification which, as I have carefully explained in my internet-based (at dju.com) course on the Principles of Islamic Investing, actually takes place at two different levels: at a fiscal level and at a moral level.
Portfolio Purification: Fiscal and Moral
It should not be necessary to explain that Zakah and purification are two entirely different, though not unrelated, matters. After all, the literal meaning of Zakah, which will be discussed later in this paper, is purification. But the purification intended for discussion here is the cleansing of an investment portfolio of impure elements.

Many Muslims are familiar with the practice of "purifying" their checking accounts, for example, by simply donating the amounts listed as "interest earned" to charity. Thus, our concern from a Shari`ah perspective is with amounts of money earned by the corporations in which our Islamic mutual fund has invested; money earned by means deemed unacceptable by Shari`ah principles and teachings. Such "impure" earnings must be quantified and then purified.

Of course, the assumption here is that these are stocks that have cleared the various screens for Shari`ah compliance. Thus, the sources of such income might include non-operating income from interest-bearing investments, or earnings from prohibited business activities that are beyond the scope of a company's primary business. Oftentimes, such earnings will result from corporate diversification and new acquisitions. Whatever their source, the fact remains that even Shari`ah-compliant equities will often yield small percentages of income that is considered impure by Shari`ah standards, and which must then be purified.

The responsibility of the Shari`ah supervisor in this regard is to ensure that all such income is calculated by the fund, and that a corresponding percentage is deducted from the earnings, passed on to investors through the dividends, thereby ensuring that these are free of impurities and completely halal.5 The methodologies for calculation may differ from fund to fund, or from one Shari`ah Supervisory Board to another, where scholars, for whatever reasons, have preferences in the matter. This, however, is of secondary importance. Of primary importance is that the fund is actually commited to, and regularly engaged in, such purification. On behalf of the investor, then, it is the Shari`ah supervisor who will ensure that purification takes place, and that it takes place in a manner that accords with Islamic law.

The tangible results of such fiscal purification are that amounts of money begin to pile up. Generally speaking, it is recommended that funds sweep these amounts into separate accounts. With the advice and counsel of the fund's Sharia`ah Supervisory Board, these amounts may be distributed among suitable charities, or a charitable fund may be established for the purpose; again, under the supervision of the Shari`ah scholars.
Of course, it is certainly possible that the matter of purification be left entirely to the individual investor. Nonetheless, when we are speaking of adding value to a fund, it is clear that the fund's performance of this function will relieve the investor of the responsibility, and the considerable time and effort required to perform it. In fact, it is clear that this is a service that is much more effectively performed by the fund itself, particularly when the calculation process, including the collection of relevant data, is not a simple matter for those not equipped to undertake it.

The second half of the purification equation is what I term moral purification, and I consider it no less important than the fiscal purification of earnings. When speaking of fiscal purification, the thing that comes immediately to mind is that we are dealing with an amount of money that has been earned by means we find unacceptable, and is therefore in need of purification. So, in our haste to put aside the offending percentage, we often overlook our moral and religious responsibility in the matter. This responsibility is perhaps best understood in the context of the Qur'anic concept of "enjoining the right and prohibiting what is wrong."

Now the ways to discharge this particular responsibility are varied. But modern corporate democracy has provided Muslim investors with every opportunity to share with management our views and sentiments with regard to corporate practice and policy. By law, in fact, publicly owned corporations are required to hold annual meetings for their shareholders, and these provide opportunities for Muslim investors, or for the Shari`ah supervisors who look after their interests, to voice their concerns to management as vocally and as directly as they feel necessary. Of course, it is impractical to suppose that Shariah supervisors will attend every annual meeting of every holding in the fund's portfolio. But it is still possible to participate in the process of corporate governance by means of proxies and absentee ballots. It is likewise possible, at any time, for shareholders to raise issues with management, and to initiate positive change, by means of corporate shareholder resolutions. When a fund with substantial holdings brings up an issue, management will surely listen.
In an Islamic fund's strategy of proactive engagement with companies, the participation of Shari`ah scholars is essential. It is essential, in the first place, to ensure that the fund is concerned with moral purification on behalf of its investors. And it is essential, thereafter, to ensure that issues of importance to Muslims, from an Islamic perspective, are represented accurately and effectively to the management of major corporations. As Islamic mutual funds grow larger, and begin to hold larger and larger blocks of shares, the attention we receive from corporations will grow proportionately. It is of all the more importance, then, that we represent our way of life in the best and most effective manner possible.
Portfolio Selection: Screening Stocks
Undoubtedly, one of the most important functions of a Shariah Supervisory Board is its scrutiny of equities for compliance with established, Shari`ah-based criteria. Much has been written on this subject in recent years, and much more remains to be written.7 For the purposes of this paper, however, suffice it to say that if an Islamic fund is not licensed to an Islamic index with a full Shari`ah Supervisory Board, then it will undoubtedly require the services of a Shari`ah Supervisory Board to oversee its choice of investments. Such choices cannot be made on the basis of software, or by simply applying the published criteria of another fund, or index. So, when an Islamic equity fund is licensed to such an index, it may at least rest assured that the stocks it invests in will accord with the guidelines for prudent Islamic investing. Even so, and I continue to explain why, it will still require Shari`ah supervision.

While I will not repeat here what has now become common knowledge in regard to the Shari`ah screening of equities, I will take this opportunity to say that beyond the quantitative screening of securities is the highly subjective matter of ethics, and what is socially responsible. Again, from the perspective of enjoining the good and prohibiting what is wrong, I believe that it is the responsibility of Shari`ah Supervisory Boards to work on these issues, even after a fund has licensed to an investable universe through an index. Muslim investors, with our spiritual, cultural, and family ties to what is politely termed the third world, are more intimately concerned with, and sensitive to, the practices and policies of multinationals.

A company's ethics, unlike its primary business and capital structure, are highly subjective and not easily quantified. In considering issues of this nature, it is important that the fund's Shari`ah Supervisory Board works closely with management on policies and guidelines that will adequately cover these issues. Islamic investing has much in common with the modern forms of investing known as ethical investing, socially responsible investing, faith investing, and green investing. Each of these investment sectors, or subsectors, has much of value to contribute; and each has something in common with the teachings of Islam. It is therefore important for Shari`ah Supervisory Boards to keep abreast of what is happening in these areas. The internet is an excellent tool for the purpose of research into these forms of investing, the organizations that support and implement their principles, and the issues that concern them. Perhaps the most encouraging thing for Muslim investors to note about the funds that have grown up around these concepts is that they have been very successful, and that they are the fastest growing sector on the market.8 Given the affinities shared by these groups and Muslim investors, it is important that Islamic funds begin to build bridges. In this effort, the participation of Shari`ah Supervisory Boards will be all important.
Portfolio Monitoring

Beyond selecting stocks is the equally important task of monitoring stocks. In the business world, there is very little that remains the same. A company with non-operating interest income at less than five percent for the present quarter, may show earnings in excess of fifteen percent for the next. Obviously, vigilance is required in these matters to ensure that all of the fund's holdings remain within the limits of the prescribed Shari`ah filters. Again, when a fund is licensed to an index, information of this nature will be passed on by the index provider as a matter of course. In such cases, the responsibility of the Shari`ah supervisor will be to verify the removal of the security from the fund's portfolio. In the case, however, that the fund is not licensed or otherwise positioned to receive such information, even more vigilance is required.

Fund management will generally assign this responsibility to their portfolio managers or research analysts. My own experience to date with portfolio managers is that they are very diligent about these matters. Even so, it is the responsibility of Shari`ah supervisors to ensure that this sort of vigilance is maintained. Very recently, specialized software has been developed that allows management, and Shariah supervisors, to track portfolios with ease. Such software, when connected to the internet, will also provide real time access to portfolios, as well as a host of third party information. To my knowledge, very few Islamic funds have actually provided their Shari`ah Supervisory Boards with this sort of access. Here again, though, the funds that do so will have a competitive edge.9 In the future, Allah willing, every Islamic fund will have this facility. In fact, work is underway on even more sophisticated software. By the time this paper is actually delivered at the 4th Annual Forum, I expect that the beta versions will be up and running. In the final analysis, however, no matter how powerful the search engine or how seamless the links in the software, the expertise of Shari`ah supervisors will be required to make the final call. The software will identify the problem, the Shari`ah Supervisory Board will solve it.

Monitoring Management

The Shari`ah supervisory function includes vigilance in relation to the management of the Islamic equity fund as well. One of the most important issues in this regard is the fund's cash-to-assets ratio. Fund or portfolio managers may keep a large cash portion on hand if, for example, they are bearish on the market, or if they are unable to find attractive securities to buy, or, in the case of an index fund, if they are temporarily unable to purchase the stocks needed to match the index. Of course, the reason for the concern of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board under these circumstances is the possibility that idle cash will lead to interest.
Likewise, Shari`ah Supervisory Boards must be especially vigilant when, owing to adverse market conditions, management decides to assume temporary defensive positions. These may occur as the result of political, economic, or a host of other reasons. The important thing, however, is that the Board ensure that the strategy does not include recourse to the conventional, knee jerk strategies of moving into high quality, short term securities and money market instruments, or commercial or agency paper, or T-bills, or CDs. At such times, it will be best for management to convene a meeting of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board, or at least to confer with the members either individually or by whatever other means, for the purpose of discussing to what lengths the fund may go. Obviously, when such situations occur, it is the expertise of the portfolio managers and analysts that will determine the defensive strategy. It is the Shari`ah Supervisory Board, however, that will determine whether or not that strategy is a lawful one from a Shari`ah perspective.

Another thing that Shari`ah supervision will watch for is the purchase of equities on margin. While managers are aware that such purchases are not permitted, oftentimes their brokers are not. It is for this reason that Shari`ah supervisors must be on guard for these sorts of seemingly innocent mistakes.

In monitoring management, as in monitoring the portfolio, the use of software is particularly helpful. Obviously, this is the trend of the future. In mentioning this, I direct my remarks to both the management of Islamic equity funds and to the members of the various Shari`ah Supervisory Boards. In the future, I expect that a further qualification for Shari`ah Supervisory Board members will be computer literacy.

As a sort of a footnote to this section, I might mention another matter I believe to be of consequence. Everyone recognizes the need for a working relationship between the members of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board and the management of the fund. What people often fail to realize, however, is that relationships between the Board and the portfolio managers, the brokers, the accountants, and the auditors are equally important. When the fund management is openly Muslim, and makes its preferences and practices known to those with whom they work (portfolio managers, brokers, analysts, etc.), there is clearly less likelihood on the part of those colleagues of lapses leading to non-compliance with Shari`ah precepts. Even so, the possibility remains. And when fund management is non-Muslim, the likelihood is greater. Thus, in both cases, it is important to establish relationships between these business associates and the Shari`ah Supervisory Board. Perhaps the best way to accomplish this is to simply introduce the members of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board to the business colleagues of the fund. A short face to face meeting for the purpose of getting acquainted is all that is required. Thereafter, if any issues arise, these may be discussed in a manner befitting professionals who have actually made each other's acquaintance and share a genuine interest in the success of the fund. Such face to face meetings can easily be scheduled around an annual meeting of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board, for example, and may even take place at a lunch or a dinner.
In this regard, I might share an example from my own experience. When our Shari`ah Supervisory Board decided that a certain fund needed to liquidate its position in a certain stock, the decision was passed by management to its broker and the stocks were sold. Moreover, the accountants were instructed to sweep the profits from dividends and capital gains into the fund's charitable account. In a matter of days, the fund's auditors contacted management to question the liquidation of such a lucrative equity, and the justification for separating its earnings. At the request of management, I spoke on the phone with the auditor and we agreed that I should subsequently inform his firm in writing of the action we had requested, and the reasons for it. Thus, a potentially confusing and time-consuming situation was taken care of in a simple and straightforward manner. And the reason that it went as smoothly as it did is that a relationship of collegiality had been established, so that there was nothing awkward or hesitant about the exchanges which took place between us. Similar relationships have led to my receiving tips from portfolio managers concerning the peripheral involvement in prohibited business on the part of certain firms whose stock was held by funds that I supervise.

Monitoring Fees
Certainly, from the perspective of the individual investor, one of the most important of all the different functions performed by a Shari`ah Supervisory Board is its ensuring that the consumer is made aware of the fund's fees and how these are structured. Here again, the Shari`ah Supervisory Board finds itself in the role of consumer advocate. While there is generally no formal channel for communication (other than quarterly or annual reports) between the Board and those who invest in the Islamic fund, the responsibility in this regard is not so much consumer education as it is a matter of the Board's satisfying itself of two essential matters. Firstly, that the fee structure is a reasonable one and, secondly, that the fees are clearly stated in the fund's literature and otherwise communicated without ambiguity to investors.

As the market for Islamic mutual funds grows, investment professionals (and even conventional brokers) will become familiar with the various offerings, and will explain all of the nuances and differences between them to their clients. At the present time, however, most Muslim investors approach Islamic funds directly, and purely on the basis of their understanding that the product offered is halal and will yield halal results only. Under such circumstances, it is very important that Islamic funds clearly state their fees,11 especially when the middle class Muslim investor may be less inclined to be meticulous on the matter. Then, while I am confident that there is no real danger of unscrupulous practices on the part of funds, my real concern is that investors fully understand what sorts of fees they are expected to pay. For example, even here in the US, where the regulatory atmosphere is so strict, the annual expense ratio, or annual fee does not appear on the client statements of most conventional funds. As a result most consumers are not even aware of it. So, if someone invests in a no-load fund, and then sees no mention of fees on their client statements, they might very well suppose that they are paying nothing to their funds.
Even aside from the annual fees and the different sorts of loads, funds will generally charge fees for a number of other services. For example, investors who move money between funds in the same family of funds (from a growth to an income fund, for example) may generally do so without any additional load. There may, however, be a fee for doing so, as well as a tax liability. It should be the responsibility of the Islamic fund to provide investors with a clear picture of their responsibilities in these instances. Such a schedule of fees, if you will, should also include information on breakpoints or volume discounts, on the investors' rights of accumulation, on surrender fees (contingent deferred sales charges), on the facilities accorded by the fund for letters of intent (including the terms of retroactive collection in the event that the LOI is not fulfilled), and on special items like performance incentives and thresholds. The concern of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board in these matters is simply that the investor be apprised of factors that may be of significance to him/her when investing Islamically. By looking out for the interests of the consumer in this manner, the Shari`ah Supervisory Board is actually adding value to the fund. This is because when all the fees are carefully spelled out for investors, there is far less chance of unpleasant surprises and the resulting ill will that might be generated by even the simplest of misunderstandings. In today's service-oriented markets, this should be more than obvious.

Monitoring Fund Documentation

Perhaps more than monitoring, this function of a Shari`ah Supervisory Board is actually one of assisting management in the preparation of filings for regulatory agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission, subscription agreements, private placement memorandums, fund prospectuses, and the like. Obviously, in the preparation of such documentation references will have to be made to the Shari`ah and its interpretations. For this reason, it is essential that the expertise of Shari`ah scholars be accomodated. It is clearly of inestimable importance that the documents which define the Islamic mutual fund and the ways it works be in complete consonance with Shari`ah precepts. The only way to ensure this is to have the Shari`ah Supervisory Board involved in the drafting and review of all pertinent legal and business documentation.

In fact, I will go one step further and suggest that Shari`ah supervision is extended to include marketing materials, like brochures, advertisements, websites, and even multimedia presentations. In all of these, reference of one sort or another is sure to be made to the Shari`ah and the Islamic nature of the fund. In order to ensure that all such references are made correctly, especially in view of the fact that these will be made public, the involvement of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board is essential.

Monitoring the Industry
As academics, the members of Shari`ah Supervisory Boards will naturally keep abreast of scholarship in their respective fields and specializations. As professionals, it is equally essential that we remain informed of developments in the industry we supervise. In order to comprehend the issues fully, the sorts of issues that require the attention of the Shari`ah Supervisory Boards, it is important to understand them in the broader context of the marketplace in general. From this perspective, the attention brought to bear on the issues by the Board will certainly be more pertinent; with the result that the Board's decisions will be more informed and ultimately of more value to the investor. This is not to say that Shari`ah Supervisory Boards should tell management how to run their business. Rather, what I mean to say is that a Board that is sensitive to the business environment is an effective Board.
In order to maintain this edge, Shari`ah Supervisory Board members need to understand the stock market and its various indicators. They also need to be able to use the tools that will allow them to follow the stock market and the factors that influence it. Thus, at the level of fund and sector performance, the Dow Jones Islamic Market Indexes and the Financial Times\TII Indices are indispensable tools. Specialized websites like Failaka.com, IslamiQ.com, and Muslim-investor.com are important sources of information about the Islamic investing sector, as are a handful of specialized publications like New Horizon, The Islamic Banker, and others. Finally, at the level of the mutual fund industry in general, the sources of information are seemingly limitless, whether in print, online, or over the airwaves. Finally, academic and professional forums, such as this one, may have much to contribute to this important aspect of Shari`ah Supervision.
Product Development
While the issue of product development is more commonly associated with Islamic banks, there is nonetheless a certain amount of scope for it in Islamic mutual funds as well. With the goal of mitigating risk through portfolio diversification, an Islamic fund might consider turning to markets other than the stock market, or to target other asset classes, like REITs. Or the fund may want to do something different as a part of a defensive strategy for a bearish market, or as a way to manage short term liquidity. Whatever the case, there will be a clear need for the expert advice and assistance of the Shari`ah Supervisory Board.
Zakah

The assumption might easily be made that if Islamic mutual funds are active in purification, then they should surely be doing something about Zakah. This, however, is not the case. The matter of Zakah is complicated by any number of factors that lie outside the control of Islamic funds (and, for that matter, Islamic banks and other financial institutions as well). Since these factors are particular to the circumstances of each investor, the matter of Zakah is best left to the investors themselves. In this regard, I will simply refer to the fatwa of the Islamic Bank of Jordan, which effectively explains the reasons why the matter of Zakah should be left to the individual Muslim investor or depositor.

Even when the matter is left to the individual, the fund may consider requesting its Shari`ah Supervisory Board to prepare guidelines for the calculation of Zakah on profits earned through investments in funds. These guidelines might then be published in brochure form and mailed to investors, or posted on the fund's web page as an extra service to its investors. As there is still a considerable amount of debate on the details of Zakah to be paid on such investments, the attention to the matter on the part of Shari`ah Supervisory Boards may indeed help in bringing about a needed consensus on several outstanding issues.
Regular Reports
Finally, one of the most important functions of a Shari`ah Supervisory Board is to prepare reports on the status of the fund it supervises. Such reports are best issued quarterly and should address issues of Shari`ah-compliance in the portfolio, and on the part of management. Likewise, the reports should keep investors informed of the purification process and the charitable ways in which purification money has been put to use by the fund. Other issues of relevance to the supervision of the fund might also be mentioned in the reports, like the new software that enables the Board to easily monitor the fund's portfolios, or to screen stocks for Shari`ah-compliance, and so on. In addition, the Board may use the reports to communicate the ways in which it is addressing issues related to socially responsible investing and the business ethics and practices of corporations. Finally, as the goal of these reports is to promote transparency and full disclosure, they should always be prepared in a straightforward manner. If shortcomings have occurred, these must be mentioned; and the steps taken to remedy the situation as well.

Conclusion
Throughout this paper, I have alluded to what the future might bring. All such references, I believe, have been made with with a degree of optimism. No one doubts that there is a sizeable, and as yet untapped, market for Islamic financial products and services, especially in the United States and Europe, and in Muslim majority countries with prosperous middle classes. When I consider this market, I see a religious community that is in many ways just as comfortable, and at ease, with the modern world as it is with its own Islamic heritage. The politics of the modern world have provided haven, and its economics have provided comfort. At the same time, Muslims are inextricably tied to Islam. My concern, as an advocate for this community, is that we receive the value that we deserve. Not only that we get what we pay for. But that the tenets of our religion are respected; not only in the sense of compliance, but in the sense of honor and esteem as well.

It will not be out of place, in our discussion of the future of Shari`ah Supervisory Boards, to mention here the need for impartiality and independence. In the same way that independent auditors are brought in to review the finances of a business, Shari`ah Supervisory Boards review compliance to Shari`ah precepts. Independent audits are understood as ways to gain and maintain the trust of investors and consumers. Independent Shari`ah supervision is the best way to gain and maintain the trust of Muslim investors and consumers.

The call goes out, from time to time, for the establishment of a central, or a unified Shari`ah Supervisory Board that could look after the interests of every Islamic bank or financial institution. Just as often the call is ignored. (Though, admittedly, an attempt was made in the eighties to establish such a central board, but for Islamic banks only.) My thinking on the subject, and I hope that this is clear from the contents of this paper, is that it is simply impossible for a centralized board to effectively perform all of the tasks required for the Shari`ah supervision of each and every Islamic financial institution. In the early 1980s, when there was only a handful of such institutions, such a notion may have seemed reasonable. But today, when Islamic mutual funds alone number nearly one hundred, the notion is highly impractical.
Not only that, but as the Islamic financial sector looks at ways to provide Shari`ahcompliant financial services to retail consumers, there is an increasing need for specialization among Shari`ah supervisory professionals. Takaful operations, for example, while based on many of the same principles, are nonetheless quite different from banking operations. The operations of commercial banks differ considerably from those of thrifts and investment banks. I expect that in the future we will come to see more specialized Shari`ah supervision, or supervision geared toward specific sectors within the Islamic finance industry as it grows in size and sophistication. Under these circumstances there is no practical future for a single, central Shari`ah Supervisory Board.
To ensure that Shari`ah Supervisory Boards remain current, however, it may be preferable to have a professional organization, an industry association if you will, that sets standards for everything of importance to Islamic mutual funds. Such an association might therefore be inclusive of standards and practices for Shari`ah Boards, Islamic funds, and fund management as well. Such an industry association might also look after the interests of membership, and promote understanding and exchange through publications and regular forums. It could also establish relationships with relevant academic, commerical, and professional bodies The industry appears to have matured to the point where such an association would be of great value to everyone involved in Islamic funds. From the perspective of a consumer advocate, I will strongly recommend the timely establishment of such an industry association.
The international dimension of Islamic finance

Keynote address by Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia, at the 2007 INCEIF Global Forum "Leadership in Global Finance – The Emerging Islamic Horizon", Kuala Lumpur, 30 August 2007.
It is my honour and great pleasure to be here to speak at this first INCEIF Global Forum,which has drawn together a distinguished gathering of scholars, researchers and practitioners from the financial services industry. Let me focus on the international dimension of Islamic finance which has continued to gain significance. Islamic finance now extends beyond the traditional predominantly Muslim economies to become an increasingly important part of the international financial system. Total assets of the Islamic financial system are estimated to exceed one trillion US dollars. It is among the fastest growing financial segments in the international financial system with an estimated annual growth of 15 to 20 percent. There is now a growing demand for Islamic financial products in the global market, far exceeding the supply of financial products and services that is being offered by the Islamic financial institutions.

As we advance forward, the international environment in which we are operating is also rapidly evolving to become more complex, competitive and challenging. In the current environment it has become more volatile and uncertain. The challenge for Islamic finance is to evolve strategies that will ensure its competitiveness, dynamism and sustainability. An aspect in the contemporary global Islamic finance that is fundamental is the “principled centred” nature of Leadership in Islam, that involves "trust" (amanah), and with that comes "responsibility" (taklif) and "accountability" (mas'-u-li-yah ). My remarks today will discuss the positive elements that Islamic finance brings to the global financial system, its prospects for enhancing international integration and the potential to strengthen the socio economic aspects of Islamic finance.

Optimizing benefits of Islamic finance

In evolving the international dimension of Islamic finance an important aspect is the optimization of the oasis of benefits and opportunities Islamic finance has the potential to provide. Islamic finance implicitly embraces strong core values and universally beneficial characters. The fundamental requirement of Islamic finance is that it is confines its activities to that which is supported by an underlying economic transaction thereby avoiding emphasis on speculative purposes. The Islamic principles require that the financial transaction be accompanied by genuine trade and business related transactions. This provides for a high level of disclosure and transparency. This thus prohibits the commoditisation of risks, which effectively leads to its proliferation through multiple layers of leveraging and disproportionate distribution. It reduces the potential for information gaps and for mispricing of risks and thus avoids the elements that could contribute to uncertainty and disruptive market conditions.

The Islamic financial system derives its strength and stability from its faculty to uphold Shariah principles. The Islamic financial system thus has an in-built dimension that promotes financial soundness and stability, as it resides within a financial trajectory underpinned by the forces of Shariah injunctions. These Shariah injunctions interweave Islamic financial transactions with genuine productive activities and prohibit involvement in illegal and unethical activities. This intrinsic principle of governance contributes towards insulating the Islamic financial system from the potential risks of financial stress triggered by excessive leverage and speculative financial activities.

Equally important is that the key components of the Islamic financial system, comprising the financial institutions, the markets and the financial infrastructure, has demonstrated its viability and robustness as a form of financial intermediation, with a mutually reinforcing role in enhancing the overall stability of the financial system. Its growing role in mobilising and channeling the funds to productive investment activities across borders brings significant benefits to the global economy. Firstly, it has the potential to contribute global growth and contributing towards some rebalancing of the global growth given that it brings about a more inclusive financial integration. Secondly, the strengthened international financial linkages allows for the potential for greater diversification of risks. The increase in the Islamic financial products, the growing number of assets classes being offered, the increased cross ownership of assets have all expanded the possibilities for greater diversification of risks and the potential for return.

The intrinsic nature of Islamic finance encourages risk management and provides confidence through explicit disclosure and transparency of the roles and responsibilities defined in the contract. The transparent nature of the Islamic financial contracts and the need for underlying economic transaction reinforces the stability of the Islamic financial system.


A vital challenge going forward is however to build a stronger, competitive and dynamic Islamic financial system that better reflects the internalization of Shariah principles in financial transactions, in its form, spirit and substance. This epitomizes the objectives of the Shariah in promoting economic and social justice. While developing Islamic financial system with products and services mirroring the conventional counterpart is acceptable as a pragmatic approach, it needs to develop further on its own paths and merits so as to maximize the potential benefits of Islamic financial system. Key to this is having an appropriate pricing benchmark to be an indicator for Islamic securities to be efficiently priced and credible.

In addition, the role of Shariah scholars who have the full understanding of the mechanics of Islamic financial products and services, are key to ensuring its continued development. At the same time, Shariah decisions, when made, needs to be disclosed. This will allow others to appreciate the juristic reasoning, which in turn would lead to a wider acceptance of Shariah decisions, particularly if they have implications on cross-border transactions.

As the Islamic financial system becomes increasingly more internationally-integrated, it is important to recognize the different regional and institutional strengths and complementarities and the need to maximize synergies. Collaboration among regional centres and key players in Islamic finance will be an important part of the process that will contribute towards greater international financial integration. Constructive engagement in the form of strategic partnerships and collaboration, as well as in market access needs to be enhanced. Allowing greater market access among players in Islamic financial centres can be a catalyst for enhanced integration and innovative elements in the Islamic financial industry.

Malaysia's experience in strengthening the international dimension of the Islamic financial system has shown positive results. This has commenced in 2002 with the inaugural issuance of a global Sukuk to the liberalizing to allow for greater market access in Islamic banking and takaful initiatives by permitting entry of foreign players.

The third area of international integration is the liberalization of our financial markets to allow for greater foreign participation. In particular, in the sukuk market, foreign corporations, multinationals and multilateral agencies may raise ringgit and foreign currency denominated instruments in our market. Our private debt securities market is the largest in South East Asia. Malaysia also has highly liberalized exchange administration system that allows for the free inflow and outflow of funds. There is also no restriction on the utilization of the funds raised in our market. The funds may be utilized for investments outside the country.

Finally, our own financial institutions have ventured beyond our domestic borders. These cumulative developments have strengthened our linkages with other Islamic financial centres.

Another area important for Islamic finance is the investment in research and development (R&D). The promotion of international strategic alliances through smart partnerships can create greater synergy that will bring about new approaches, new technologies and new areas of specialization. Such collaborative efforts amongst Islamic financial institutions would strengthen the ability to leverage on the industry's expertise. The introduction of innovative Islamic financial products in a specific jurisdictions can be expanded to other jurisdictions, which in turn, will contribute to broaden and deepen Islamic financial markets and thus strengthen the overall development of the Islamic financial industry. In addition, collaboration between academic researchers and the practitioners will enable the practical application of such research findings.

In the area of education and training in Islamic finance, there is now a critical shortage of talent in the Islamic financial industry. Collaboration between training institutions is vital to developing the pool of expertise in Islamic finance that subscribes to common standards. Establishing a network of mutual co-operation and collaboration would strengthen the efforts among the institutions of higher learning across regions in the areas of curriculum development, research, training, exchange of ideas and information, and resources in Islamic finance. Such partnerships in connecting the knowledge communities between regions would facilitate this process.

In the area of Shariah, the progressive convergence of Shariah views and rulings, the mutual recognition of financial standards and products across jurisdictions would be major driver towards greater international financial integration. Such a convergence and harmonisation can only happen with greater engagement among the regulators, practitioners and scholars in Islamic finance in the international community.

Finally this integration process also requires greater cooperation among the regulators to ensure that the Islamic financial system is not subject to vulnerabilities and abuses and thus ensuring its soundness and stability. In this respect, the sharing of information among the regulators including across borders is important especially in a more globalised and liberalised environment where financial transactions and activities have become more complex and globalised. In this regard, there is a greater need for regulators to be continuously connected to share information on key issues and developments faced in their own financial jurisdictions. In this respect, the Islamic Financial Services Board has an important role to facilitate this process.

Closer financial linkages among Islamic financial institutions from different jurisdictions is essential to contribute towards accelerating the process and towards serving as a bridge to strengthen the relationship of the international Islamic financial markets as well as the investment and trade ties between regions. Such linkages within the industry could also lead to new product offerings and to co-arranging financing. There could also be mutual development of IT systems and other technologies including other research and development endeavours.

Finally, let me touch on the development of the socio-economic aspects of Islamic finance. While "profit motivated" Islamic financial institutions will continue to evolve and gain greater significance, this trend also needs to be complemented with similar evolution in the socio economic aspects of Islamic finance such as waqf and zakat. A stronger zakat and waqf system would not only complete the equation for a comprehensive Islamic financial system that supports a more equitable distribution of wealth to ensure fairness and equity, it will also become the user of the Islamic financial services particularly in the management and investment of the zakat and waqf funds. In addition, access to Islamic financial services to micro enterprises would bring such activities into the economic mainstream and improve their level of performance.

Conclusion

As Islamic finance advances forward to become an integral component of the international financial system, continuous efforts are needed to further develop the domestic financial system to meet the changing requirements of a highly dynamic and rapidly evolving environment. In our quest to build a viable and sustainable Islamic financial system, the aim is to contribute to the channeling of capital flows to productive investments, create wealth and promote economic activities, that conforms to the principles and values of Shariah. With this, the Islamic financial system will ultimately bring benefit not just among Muslims but with the rest of humanity, Insyaallah. Thank you.
Islamic Finance



Navid Goraya, Managing Director, Global Head Wealth Management Group, HSBC Amanah
Can a credit card ever be Halal?

At first glance you'd be forgiven for thinking that a marketing brochure for an Islamic credit card must be some kind of elaborate hoax. But banks in the region are now making such seemingly impossible concepts a reality

We all know the arguments in favour of credit cards: "it enables me to spread payment for large purchases;" "it's too dangerous to carry cash;" "sometimes a card is a prerequisite for transactions such as Internet purchases and rental collateral". The problem for Muslim consumers, of course, is that the whole concept of the conventional credit card is unacceptable on religious grounds. Interest payments made when the outstanding balance is not repaid in full are Riba payments, and therefore forbidden in Islam.

Despite this clear-cut position, there are various grey areas of interpretation that enable some Muslims to align credit card usage with their religious beliefs. For example, if one commits to paying off the balance every month and therefore never utilises the credit option of the card, then one can say that Riba is being avoided and thus the card is Halal. As Islamic scholars such as Shariffa Carlo Al Andalusia have discussed when debating such interpretations, however, this argument still doesn't hold water since the signing of a credit card agreement is the signing of an agreement to pay Riba should the cardholder fail to make every repayment in full and on time. Since no human can either know what the future holds or guarantee their own infallibility, such scholars say, then Muslims cannot enter into any contract that promises that they can.

From the card issuer's point of view, therefore, several problems become instantly obvious. Not only will the bank make little or no revenue from a credit card if the balance is repaid in full, but in religious terms it will be colluding in the commitment of sin if it arranges and signs a contract wherein a Muslim agrees to pay Riba in the case of non-payment of the balance. Quite apart from that, the extension of credit with a view to making profit is not a Qard Hassan loan, and thus is unacceptable in religious terms for the creditor as well as the borrower.

Despite this daunting and complex problem, banks have tallied up the market of some 250 million Muslims in MENA and Asia who want and need financing options, and several have decided that this is an opportunity too great to pass up on. Some banks have reacted to this situation by offering credit cards that aren't credit cards at all in a conventional sense. The Dubai Islamic Bank, as just one example, offers a Visa Classic Card but then debits the balance automatically from the holder's current or savings account every month. In effect this is a debit card, as officially no credit is extended to the consumer and so no injunctions against Riba have been broken. The consumer may get a short-term loan in practice, for example if he purchases an item at the beginning of the month and the payment is not debited until the end of the month, but that is a matter of bank administration rather than any deliberate contract to loan funds with a view to paying interest on them.

This example, of course, does not look very profitable for the bank. A membership fee can be charged for the service provided by the card, but otherwise it is more of a value-added service to account holders than a significant retail revenue stream. As a result, banks that are keen to offer a fully-functional and profitable Islamic credit card have been unsatisfied with the debit card alone and so have sought ingenious ways of constructing Sharia-compliant card agreements and repayment structures. These structures one might very loosely describe as falling into either the Asian school of thought or the Gulf school of thought.

The Asian solution


Launched in December 2001, the Al Taslif Credit Card from AmBank in Malaysia (formerly the Arab Malaysian Banking Group) works off the Sharia principle of Bai' Al Inah that covers instalment repayments over a fixed period. Cardholders are charged 1.25% per month or 15% per annum on the outstanding balance, with nothing to pay if the minimum payment requested is made on time. The Bai' Al Inah contract works on the basis of two 'akad' agreements. The first is the bank's agreement to sell an item to the customer at an agreed price, with the second agreement covering the customer selling back to the bank at a lower price. The difference is the bank's profit on the transaction and is a predetermined amount.

Though a percentage repayment is being made, this differs from conventional structures in that payment of the minimum balance only does not trigger interest repayments for the outstanding balance. Just from spending on the card, consumers are also helping charities via the AmBonus scheme. For every RM100 spent on the Al Taslif card, an AmBonus of RM1 is earned that goes to pay off the annual card fee. Once that fee has been repaid, however, all future AmBonus points are donated to charities by the bank.

More recently, Bank Islam Malaysia launched its Bank Islam Card (BIC) on 23rd July 2002, the name of the product deliberately avoiding the word 'credit'. The bank claims that this card, available in MasterCard Classic or Gold, is the first credit card to be based on Sharia contracts and that is thus free from Riba or Gharar (uncertainty) due to the fact that the maximum profit earned is declared up front. BIC also has the distinction of being the first EMV Smart chip card issued in Malaysia.

The bank says that this card works off a combination of three Sharia contracts: Bai' Al Inah (as for AmBank's Al Taslif card), Wadiah and Qard Hassan. Once an initial Bai' Al Inah transaction has taken place, the item nominally transacted being "a piece of land" according to the bank, the proceeds of the second transaction are transferred into the customer's Wadiah BIC account at the bank. The customer can then use the BIC card to make payments with the collateral all coming from the funds in the Wadiah account. Finally the Qard Hassan contract is activated if the cardholder wants to spend more than the funds available in the Wadiah account and the bank agrees to make more funds available on an interest-free basis. The bank's Chairman, Datuk Mohammed Youssef Nasir, says that Bank Islam will have targeted some 55,000 banking consumers with the BIC card by June this year.
"The extension of credit with a view to making profit is not a Qard Hassan loan and thus is unacceptable in religious terms for the creditor as well as the borrower"
The more stringent Gulf view

Critics of solutions such as the two above say that the Bai' Al Inah contract is ethically flimsy when applied in this manner as the sale transacted is a fake sale and thus just a means of masking Riba. As is the case with matters of Sharia-compliance, judgements are based on the Sharia board of each financial institution and so what may be acceptable to one board may yet be Haram for another. For many Middle East bankers, therefore, the solutions found by the Asian banks are simply not stringent enough in their interpretation of Qu'ranic rules. One Bahrain-based banker who prefers to remain anonymous believes that the Asian interpretation boils down to an injunction against using the card to purchase Haram items and services, and indeed the BIC card will reject transactions related to bars, gambling, massages and so on for payment. The depth of the Sharia-compliance of the card contracts, he believes, are less important to the banks than the avoidance of involvement in any blatantly Haram transactions.
Whether you feel this is a fair accusation or not, Gulf banks do appear to be taking a different tack in their approach to credit card contracts. In September 2002 Shamil Bank in Bahrain announced the launch of what in the words of Dr Ahmed Fouad Darwish, Head of Research, Planning and Development, he believes to be "the first Islamic credit card to be launched by a bank in Bahrain and probably in the world". The word 'probably' is a fair caveat in this statement, since as has become apparent there are multiple views on what might constitute an Islamic credit card and certainly several claimants to the laurels for launching the first one.

Dr Darwish explains that the development process started with the Shamil Card, effectively a convenience charge card. The bank charged fees to cover administrative and processing costs and the collateral was the balance in the cardholder's account. Progress began, however, when the bank began to see its relationship with the cardholder in terms of guarantees. In the case of the charge card, Dr Darwish says, the customer has guaranteed himself and his purchased with the balance of his deposits, the bank making money purely off the fee structure.

From this viewpoint, the bank was then able to change tactics when exploring the possibility of an Islamic credit card. It decided that the solution to Riba avoidance was to exercise the acceptable right of charging for the provision of a financial guarantee. "There must be cost elements involved in making that guarantee," Dr Darwish explains, "and in honouring the guarantee those costs are staff costs, processing costs and so on". The guarantee system works by agreeing that the card issuer is guaranteeing the cardholder's payment to the acquirer in any transaction undertaken. That guarantee holds sway in the time lag between the issuer's payment and the acquirer's receipt of funds.

The result of this research is the Al Rubban MasterCard, available in Bahraini dinars, Saudi riyals or US dollars. No Wadiah deposit is required as the collateral comes from a direct salary transfer rather than a balance. The payment system works by treating total card spend during any given month as being payable over 12 monthly instalments. So, for a balance generated of BD100, 12 equal monthly instalments of BD8.34 will be due. The revenue comes from a 5% fee for the provision of the guarantee and administrative costs that is levied on the first statement containing the transaction. This fee must be settled by the due date on that statement and there is a fixed fee for cash advances that must also be repaid in full on the due date of that first statement. Dr Darwish adds that the repayment period is set at 12 months for ease and convenience while the card is still being tested in the market, and that the instalment period can be extended. The key point, he says, is that there is no link between the fees charged and the repayment period as in the case for conventional card repayments.

At about the same time that Shamil launched Al Rubban, fellow Bahrain-based institution, ABC Islamic Bank, also released details of its Al Buraq credit card. The bank had firstly set up a subsidiary called the Islamic Credit Card (ICC) company. The issue of Al Buraq cards began with bank employees and corporate clients and is now available to individuals through ICC participating banks. With the ABC strategy, proliferating the card through multiple markets so as to rapidly earn market share is a high priority. As a result, although ABC has kept $3 million Class a ICC shares to itself, Mohammed Buqais, GM of ABC Islamic Bank, says that major Islamic banks and financial institutions have been invited to buy ICC Class B shares and thus gain the authority to issue Al Buraq cards to their customer bases in other countries.

Neither Shamil nor ABC Islamic Bank are unique in their investigation of Sharia-compliant cards. Al Rahji Banking & Investment Corporation (ARABIC) in Saudi Arabia, for example, also offers Sharia-approved Visa and MasterCards. The question doesn't appear to be whether Halal credit cards should be created, rather the focus is on exactly how they can be designed to be profitable and cost effective for customers while also being Sharia-compliant. If the efforts of pioneers such as Shamil and ABC prove a success, we can expect to see more design ingenuity applied to the issue so that the local banks really can meet the demands of local customers, however mountainous the challenge of meeting those needs might at first appear to be.